I only thought of this now, while reviewing some of the Game Center announcements from today's Apple media event and multitasking by phoning in my Thai food order. The iOS devices in combination with iTunes and the App Store are destroying traditional media delivery modes and generating unprecedented wealth for Apple:
- games
- apps/software
- music
- video
iTunes is, as Jobs said earlier today, the world's largest digital media store.
So why does the lowly Kindle continue to beat Apple at the eBook/digital content game?
(This is a question for you, readers. I'm not setting myself up to deliver the answer but will offer some thoughts in true Socratic form)
- Is it because possibly the only superior payments/purchase/delivery platform to iTunes is Amazon? Amazon focused, historically, on books, and made the process as simple and intuitive and reliable as possible. Netflix, also an able competitor of Apple's, focused on movies, and achieved the same effect as Amazon -- simple, intuitive, reliable. Both also incorporated a strong recommendation engine into the mix. iTunes did the same with music. iTunes retains it leadership in music, is a challenge to Netflix and is using iPad as a battering ram against Amazon. Nonetheless, it proves again that we want to consume media, will pay for media, but want it now, want it fairly priced and want it as easy and pain-free and intuitive as possible. With my two degrees, I have still failed to master Google Checkout, for example.
- With the Kindle, Amazon has optimized a device for media. Only, in this case, books. For all the complaints about the iPhone 4 antenna or the Safari browser, for example, or that Android offers more processing power (not true), Apple created a line-up of iOS devices (iPod, iPad, iPhone) that are *optimized* for media. That is, media review, media discovery, media purchase, media download, media management and, within DRM, media sharing. So simple, even a grandparent can use it. Was Zune, for example, ever optimized for this -- or for Windows Media, which is the ass-backwards way of doing things? The Android Marketplace is managed by Google -- who before they went over to the dark side were supposed to be organizing the world's information for our benefit -- and yet they can't even optimize their site for their customers just to buy an app! Go on, try it. I dare you.
- With respect to books, Amazon has a brand and a history -- and a platform -- for sales. Likewise, Apple has this, though more so for music and videos and apps and games than e-books. No other competitor to iOS can say the same. (Which still shocks me. How long has Sony made smartphones? PSPs? And still no PSP smartphone that anyone on the planet might actually like? And only today have they even *announced* e-Readers that offer wireless book sales!) The smartphone wars may be a battle of platforms -- Android, Windows, Symbian, iOS. Or, perhaps we have it all wrong and it's a platform for the creation, discovery, purchase, playing and sharing of media. If so, Apple may remain King for a generation.
- Might it be because we've all been using Amazon for so long? If so, consider how many tens of millions of children (and grandparents) use iTunes and iOS devices, more and more, to purchase and use media. Day after day, year after year. Just this weekend, my son forked over his allowance in exchange for an iTunes card. Again, this puts Apple and Amazon way out in front. As I always say, "information wants to be monetized." Why are Apple competitors making this hard!
Other reasons? Better reasons?
